Solar vs. Energy Efficiency
Solar gets more subsidies, but home energy efficiency may be more cost-effective.
By Ben Arnoldy| Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor/ November 26, 2008 edition
When Ted and Astrid Olsson set out to cut their home electricity bill, they had three strong incentives to buy solar panels: federal, state, and city subsidies. But they shelved the idea in favor of insulating the attic of their San Francisco Victorian.
While it’s not as sexy as a rooftop rack of silicon, improving a home’s energy efficiency tends to be the more cost-effective way to trim carbon emissions. So why are politicians showering subsidies on residential solar instead?



